« Previous Is it Cold in Here? | And When You Walk, You Hear the Sound of a Thousand Tiny Drag Queens Clapping Next »
Submitted by: Wilson Linker via Submission Page
Not that there’s anything wrong with that. The homo part, that is. There is something very wrong with the pants. And the shirt. Is that from the same collection?
 | JohnTheRevelator on THIS IS WHY WE HAVE AN EYELINE… |
 | Very un-dude on She’s Ready for the Road… |
 | Odexy on Longer Shirts, That’s Al… |
| Odexy on Dressed to WIN: Make the Most … |
 | Heywood on New Bathing Suit, Eh? |
 | Meatywood on Getting All of the…… |
 | Shipoopi on New Bathing Suit, Eh? |
 | The Occupant on Who’s Outfit is it … |
 | Queen Medic on This Walmart is SO Not Ka… |
| Queen Medic on Longer Shirts, That’s Al… |
Maybe he is now to the club and does no know the fashion rules yet.
Heck, he probably hasn’t even gotten his free toaster yet…
The fashion rules handout comes with the homosexual agenda. We’re a little behind in giving out the packets to new members. Sorry!
Looks like an ensemble my 80 year old father would pick out. In fact, it could even be him!
OH, thats really nice, thanks that made my day.
you are welcome abigail … im so proud of my lol! It made my day … and it was easter in cuba!
The Dockers(tm) unwanted stepchild….?
I see the new Truth In Advertising laws are starting to work.
am i the only one who thinks that’s fake and is really dockers?
this is super real… i was there … i took the picture… it was in a catholic church… on easter no lessss…..
AND he’s wearing a shirt made from the same material as one of my duvet covers
for more even more fun google “dockers homo”
I’m a homo, and wearing Dockers even now. I kind of want a pair that actually says “homo” on them. The 1980s can have that shirt back, though.