Submitted by: fashionwhore via Submission Page
No matter how nice your body is, it’s still going to look bad if you squeeze 99% of your flesh into tight fetish wear, leaving a tiny space for your suffocating skin to poke out of. Lady, your legs are begging you to stop this. Please take off those stockings before they use your gun tattoos of off themselves.
-
-
Copy & paste this:
Two things occurred to me after my brain finished screaming “NOooooOOO!!”.
1) NO ONE else around her is dressed in this manner. Therefore, her outfit is inappropriate. Although, even at a fetish convention, her dress does not fit and makes her bum look like a squashed pudding.
2) Why does she have a Mickey and Minnie mouse on her (hideous and unmatching) purse?
The purse belongs to the man next to her. Her purse is that huge bag over her left shoulder that used an entire cow hide to make.
No, it really looks like it does but if you follow the string strap up… it extends past his shoulder. Plus the Mickey pin is very in focus for being that far away
No, above his shoulder is part of the structure of whatever it is they are all facing.
certain things should not be made in certain sizes.
I can’t agree with you more. We once again have a case of an overweight woman who thinks her body is sexier than it actually is. Showing off rolls is not hot or appropriate (although her dress/shirt just isn’t appropriate in general, no matter what the weight. I can definitely see ass).
It is not a case of her thinking her body is sexier than it is, but a case of her not buying clothes in the right size. If she had the same clothes in a size that fit her well she would look fine.
No, I’m pretty sure that people who show off that much of their body intentionally think they are hot s**t. If she had an issues with her body, she would think “oh s**t, this shows off my ass and my leg fat, I think I’ll change”. Why would someone who wasn’t confident about their body buy 5 sizes too small in the first place?
ew, i can see the hair on her ass
I’m just dying to see her trigger man.
Its never wrong to wear stockings!!!
The “Dress” is a huge fail
Somewhere, I think, is a lost and forgotten sad skirt, looking for it’s master…
In fact, I cannot think of a worse way showing off this lady’s gun tattoos…
She just needs a little longer skirt, one that goes to the middle of the lace trim. Then people would think she has nice legs, without realizing where most of her thighs have now be relocated.
She doesn”t need a longer skirt she needs a mu-mu.
thats a very good thought! It never occured to me lol
doesn’t she feel the breeze on her brown eye?
…The stockings are fine, if a bit squished at the top. However if her skirt were long enough to be a skirt at all, we wouldn’t even notice the stockings. What are those tattoos, the new tramp stamp?
It looks like she’s trying not to fart.
IT DOES!
Omg brb dying of laughter here….
Where are her flippin’ undies/pants at? Hellooooo???
thong.
yeah, I’d say thong also
Now what position must one take to have such unique art applied and does the tat artist receive combat pay? Dear Chelli – they aren’ t made in certain sizes but that does not stop people from trying to get into them. Humph Humph Grunt Arrrgh!! Tug, pull struggle, snap! “Mmmmm! these fit perfect, right honey?” Yeah bud better say “yes pumpkin” If she has revolvers on her ass cheeks what the hell is in the big purse?
There’s plenty of room for a third gun in that holster.
Is it my imagination or can you see a tinge of hiney hair encircling her perimeter?
I was just about to say is that a hairy crack I spy?
good luck pulling them guns out!
“Her”? ‘Cause all I can see is “fail tranny in need of a good wax job to his ass”.
no, you can definitly tell it is a woman, or a transgendered man
Nice Guns..huh…
I quit coping at the badly bleached hair and refused to acknowledge anything below.
Is it just me, or is the final sentence just worded wrong?
“Please take off those stockings before they use your gun tattoos of off themselves.”
Shouldn’t it have been “… before they use your gun tattoos off of themselves”? Even then, that sounds a little weird.
TO off themselves. The implication being that if she doesn’t get out of those thigh highs soon, her stockings will take matters into their own “hands” and commit suicide using her gun tats. Pretty straight forward typo, really…
I think it’s a typo. It seems as if the author was meaning to say “to off themselves” rather than “of off themselves”.
While the outfit is certainly trashy and a bit too tight, how sad of a society we have become to consider her fat. Shes not fat in the least- just not an anorexic beanpole that is considered the norm for today’s women.
Actually, I think it’s quite sad that part of society would classify this woman as ‘just fine’. The term ‘fat’ usually refers to someone that is overweight (as in, over the scientific average for their height). While there are some cases in which one can be overweight and not be fat (as in, a person that has a alot of muscles, as muscles weigh more than fat), it’s still a decent judging system.
Now, this woman is obviously overweight. One can see this by looking at her body shape, her behind, and the flab on her upper arms and thighs. Therefore, there is nothing incorrect about calling her fat (although perhaps chubby would be more correct considering the way the word ‘fat’ is often used for bigger cases, for whatever reason). This woman is NOT the average weight for her height! I don’t understand how anyone with the sense of sight could deny this fact. :/
NO ONE is suggesting that one must starve themselves or be extremely underweight to be “not fat”, and to suggest such is just silly of you. By the way, an average weight woman is not an anorexic woman or a beanpole. Hell, even a skinny woman is not necessarily anorexic. It would be lovely if you stop throwing around medical disorders to refer to anyone who is not chubby, don’t you think?
she is still clinically normal weight, but in the high end. so, shes not overweight, but she is fat.
I wouldn’t consider her fat at all, and some people have a bone structure that requires a larger frame. However, she should try and tone up a bit.
off topic-overweight people are often healthier than skinny people. It’s not so much weight, as lifestyle.
Are you trolling?
I really don’t think she’s average weight according to the standard BMI system, sorry. Also, saying that she’s ‘not overweight’ but is ‘fat’ makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Try again.
And Amee, it really doesn’t matter what you consider fat. I could claim that i don’t find a 300 pound woman to be fat, but she is still technically fat. And yes, someone who is 20 pounds overweight will likely be healthier than someone who is 20 pounds underweight, as a body can handle carrying an extra 20 pounds more than it can being underweight 20 pounds. I thought that was common knowledge, however.
And no, I’m not trolling in the least. I fail to see how one would come to that conclusion. I honestly think it’s a bit sad that the term ‘fat’ is now reserved for the obese, while those who are overweight are considered ‘average’ and ‘normal’ when this is not at all the case. Plus, this system of thinking causes people to call ACTUALLY average girls ‘anorexic’ (even though they are the healthiest of the lot), which is ridiculous and cruel. And heaven forbid if you are five pounds underweight naturally! You must never EAT!
Actually, I think her BMI might be under 25 (and at least where I’m from, that’s where “overweight” starts). I have a friend who is bigger than her (legs, butt and waist) and her BMI is somewhere between 24,8 and 24,9 (I know ’cause she got upset when her doctor told her that even though she’s not technically overweight, she “should consider loosing some weight”). It’s hard to judge from the picture, though.
judging by the picture i’d say she is overweight, bordering on obese. im 6ft tall and wear 32-34 inch waist pants and my bmi is bordering on overweight. i can pinch a bit of fat on my belly but not much anywhere else.
i agree with princess. this woman is probably ‘normal’ or ‘average’ in developed countries but that doesnt indicate she is healthy or attractive. that is an indication that people are getting fatter. its just that now we are in so much denial about it we are willing to show it off like we look good and defend a stranger’s weight on the internet because it challenges what we want to believe. she’s fat!
Bordering on obese, srly? That would be a BMI 30+. Honestly, I do not believe that she has that. I’m 5.6ft myself and I just checked w/ an online BMI calculator (however reliable that may be): Just to get to a BMI of 24.5 (which would still be considered “normal”) I’d have to go up to 154 pounds! I can “pinch a bit of fat on my belly” myself, right now, and I really think that after gaining 25 pounds, there would be a lot more than just that. I might believe that she’s over 25 or 26, but 30? No way.
It’s interesting, though, how many ppl here on this site say that ppl nowadays think overweight ppl are actually “normal” (as in “not overweight”). Around here (that being Western Europe) I see the opposite thing happening: Girls w/ perfectly healthy bodies (wearing size 6 or 8) think they’re fat and that only a BMI under 20 or even 19 is actually pretty and “not fat”. And girls w/ a BMI of 23 or 24 think they’re obese. Personally, I think that’s sad.
But, then again, personally I prefer a girl (or a guy) that is 10 pounds past a BMI of 25 over one that is 10 pounds short of a BMI of 18.5. So, while you may not think that this woman is attractive, I think she has a nice enough body (although the clothes are horrible), her BMI being whatever it may be.
That wasn’t supposed to be a smiley, it as supposed to be an “8″ and a “)”.
OMG im so grossed out
The real que- Never mind I take that back- The Question is. who say that, and thought “hey ill take a picture, and post it where the rest of the poor innocent world can see it and be ruined?” Like REALLY?!? Would you take this picture?
A corset in underwear; in public, you put clothes over it!
And why must it be butt-squishing? Butts are not meant to be flat!
*a corset IS underwear
Why do I only see typoes after posting???
a corset can be used as other things than as underwear. Though i agree with some of the previous posts, she needs a longer dress.
Nah, nowadays you can wear ‘em as a top. I see a lot more ppl wearing them as a top than I see ppl actually wearing them as underwear.
Agree on the butt comment, though.
somebody(not me) needs to walk up behind her & goose her…lol
OOOH! OOH! Pick me!!! Pick Me!!!!
LOL..OK..if you ever see her..goose her. might be rewarding..lol
Why do some women think that wearing clothes that are at least 2 sizes off is a good idea? It never was and it never will be, for no one! If they’re too big, they make you look bigger than you are, if they’re too small, they make you look … bigger than you are (and they destroy the natural, sexy shape. Just look at her behind).
I think she has a nice body but she needs to get a fitting skirt.
It’s a hairy situation.
I’m guessing she has been (like so many Americans) molested as a wee child, seeks sexual attention because it comes easily…and has not enough money for therapy so she may see how obviously she needs to heal and change.
Bless Up!~
TK
My best guess on the tats is that they were six shooters when she got ‘em, but in the intervening years, they became shotguns. Butt hairs. Ew. I’m going to think about that every time I have to sit in public places now…
knowing a tattoo artist, and some of the horrors he’s had to witness- I have pity for the poor bastard that had to ink those there
now everybody sing…”Bom bom bom bom ,I see your hiney…it’s bright & shiney …you better hide it…before I bite it…YEOWW…bom bom bom bom…” that’s just a little something I heard years ago & its still stuck in my head.
I think she’s pretty hot to be quite honest. I’d totally tap.
I have seen many women with broad shoulders
Hmmm.Now that I think about it…this is a cross-dresser.Look next to her.( her left) She’s much taller than that person.She/He has a hairy crack.Horrible choice in clothes.Bad purses( plural).
The mickie and minnie fetish.
Cross-dresser.
This was taken at Hootenanny 2010 where the headliners were Chuck Berry and Jerry Lee Lewis. Her outfit was severely out of place! Her “skirt” is a garter belt and while she isn’t as fat as this angle makes her look, this is an accurate potrayal of her lumpy ass.
Er, I’m pretty sure her butt hanging out is intentional, people. How could she not feel the air on her cheeks? (Ew, why do I think of these things?)
Those gun tattoos are stupid but where they’re located is the biggest part of that tattoo fail for me. It would be much more attractive looking if she had those guns on her back or something and not like an inch from her butt cheeks.
That bag is the best part of her outfit, although I don’t care for it. Second place goes to those leggings, which weren’t a great decision either. The disaster about this is that wayyyyy too short inappropriate dress for her age thats revealing way too much and squeezing everywhere it shouldn’t. I’m sure there were guys asking her how much.
Why has no-one mentioned that this person is not wearing knickers? Where was the photographer when they took this? How drunk were they to press the shutter? All these are Important Questions.
ps. Glad this is not from the front*!!
Well, a front view might determine if it is a woman or not…or a Really small man..
*KSHTSH* Rubber ducky, this is Fu Manchu. We have sighted a suspicious lingerie doxy who appears to be smuggling water pistols in the gluteus minimus ballpark. Must be peddling bootleg enimas again. Over *KSHTSH*
Am I the only one who noticed the weird stripes down the arms? What’s up with that?
I noticed the arm stripes too but with the butt thing going on I forgot to mention it…
Actually this was taken at Ink n Iron. I actually know this chick and i thought it was funny as hell. I had to do a double take and stare at it to come to the conclusion “Yeah…her ass is hanging out.”