I’m having a really hard time trying to understand how this happened… how do you actually forget your pants?
Submitted by: Unknown
Via: At Starbucks on Melrose Ave
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Not Exactly How I Picture Frankenstein | Fact: Cheetah Print Won’t Help You Run Faster Next »
Somebody Definitely Needs Their Morning Cup…
» See all 155 comments
Leave a Reply
-
Chic Chatter
Kinseth on The Saddest Narwhal You’… ClariPossum on Who’s Outfit is it … ClariPossum on Baby, Baby, Baby, Oooooh ClariPossum on This Walmart is SO Not Ka… mad_mad_river on Cash Curls Everywhere Around… ClariPossum on It Won’t Sink, That… kitzkatz on Teach Me of These Magical Smoo… mad_mad_river on When All Other Pockets Fa… short1fry on It Won’t Sink, That… John on Baby, Baby, Baby, Oooooh
I do believe she’s wearing tights, you can see the bottom of the legging close to her shoes. Also…
First!
buuut they are nude leggings and she doesnt appear to be wearing any panties… also I wish shed turn around.
leggings are opaque…you wouldn’t see anything.
they look like they are orange to me, down by her left leg it looks like you can see a bit of ankle, which is wrinkled a bit whiter…
Turn around, go home, and put on some pants…
My sister says she made it all the way to the bus stop in just leggings the other day before realizing her mistake and doing just that… Luckily she had a long coat…
No! Don’t turn around.. for the love of god, please don’t turn around..
Keep wishing dingbat. It’s a .jpg not a .gif
ah yeah.. but the butt looks fake or edited
i was going to say… at first i was like “wow whats her secret?” makes sense now LOL
Nope, failblog has to blur it, they obviously didnt do a good job lol
Reminds me of when George Costanzo wore a flesh tone body suit to go streaking. She obviously wants the attention of no pants without the indecent exposure charge.
What you might be seeing is whatever she’s got on her feet inside those boots. All signs say that this gal is in fact NOT wearing pants or leggings
She actually does! I have a pair exactly like those… I just choose to wear mine with a longer top
it has to be shopped look at the shadows they arent even placed correctly and they didnt put all of the shadows needed
Look at the ankles – she’s wearing peach spandex pants.
Pants-less or tights-wearing, it makes no difference. She still looks totally sketch, and possibly fashion-blind.
Is peach spandex really much of an improvement over naked?
I think she’s using skin color legging. If she was naked, the man next her will notice. Unless he’s gay or blind.
Agreed! No man could resist staring.
PHOTOSHOPPED.
Definitely.
THANKYOU. Jesus, it’s so obvious. Look how the shape of the skirt is flat, not even curved. It was longer and someone just moved it up. The “top” of that skirt looks like it was originally just below her bottom.
And if you look at the (quite) mini skirt, the top part (just below the hem of the waistcoat, (about 2in worth) and bottom parts are different shades/tones, the upper part… Definitely a shoop.
It’s definitely not a skirt. See how the sleeves have the same pattern? It’s just a long shirt, she’s wearing a vest over it, and then she’s wearing hideously colored leggings, or spandex pants. It’s one of those two.
It’s sad that we think of ‘faux tan orange’ as being a skin color.
Yet one more reason to hate Snooki.
Too true.
I think even a GAY guy would notice a NAKED woman at a shop counter…
My guess is the man is now gay and blind!
If he was gay. He would walk up to her and say “Sorry honey, but too much skin was so five minutes ago!”
Another picture showing why flesh-colored tights are ALWAYS a bad idea!
They need to be banned. Or people need to stop wearing leggings as pants.
flesh tights are okay when you are wearing a long enough skirt or dress, but leggings or tights should never EVER EVER EVER EEVVEERRR be worn as pants. this makes me more mad than any other fashion trend ever and chicks need to stop. learn from me, i remember what pants are.
Leg coloured leggings! Give me a prize.
Scarily enough, I think she’s actually wearing pants. Just a really, really poor choice in color. (I don’t think I can type enough ‘really’s')
Oh, darlin’, that’s not the worst I’ve seen, either.
I was minding my own business on campus one day when I saw this rather large (read, quite large) woman on campus wearing translucent white leggings. It wouldn’t have been so bad if they weren’t translucent–as it was you could see every single roll of fat and massive blobs of cellulite.
Terrible, I tell you…not enough eye/mind bleach for that image. I really ought to carry a camera around campus and just start uploading what I see!
We must go to the same school…Either that or it’s become socially acceptable to intentionally blind people.
Well if you go to school in the South, it’s possible to be the latter…haha. And if you do go to school there the former also becomes possible.
Which only proves the adage: Just because they make it in your size doesn’t mean you should wear it.
Joan Rivers said it best. “Just because it zips, doesn’t mean it fits!”
leggings arent really “sizes”, people just cram their fat a**es into them coz they think it makes them look skinnier. i wonder where theyre from sometimes, coz i thought mirrors existed all over the world?
I hate the leggings as pants style, and college girls are infamous for wearing them as pants. I hate it when these people get leggings and tights/stockings confused, and its always the rather large women. LEGGINGS are thick and opaque. Tights are completely translucent and are supposed to be worn with skirts, dresses, etc. I hate the leggings as pants too, but at least they aren’t see-through.
I think this is how every hot chick should be getting their morning coffee….the more the better, and I’d be spending too much time at the coffee shop if they did.
sorry…hang on…just to clarify…you find her hot?
I believe he finds the easily penetratable aspect of the ass in question hot.
Actually, if you look really, really closely, you can see that she’s wearing hideous leggings. Ugh.
I know how it happened…..photoshop
Those are leggings.
…and leggings are NOT pants.
Those are totally leggings and you are correct. Leggings are NOT PANTS! But as that is my local starbucks on Melrose here in LA I’m not surprised by this picture at all.
Why the F do ppl insist on wearing leggings as if they are pants? they are not stop it America… just stop.
If only more people understood this!
I don’t think she forgot her pants, I think they’re just flesh toned. Look at her ankles.
But still, sexy.
yeah, looking like a moron is soo sexy
how could you possibly think this is sexy? why do you think so many young americans are pregnant? coz they’re all frickin sluts, thats why. i hope you feel like a creep now. its not sexy, guys just think it is because the girls are pretty much nude. guys make themselves believe that its sexy just coz they get it up knowing the girls basically nude, but that doesnt mean its sexy. its called hormones. no one covers anything anymore, and its getting to be ridiculous.i would totally protest this, and i wish… i wish SO BAD that i could make this illegal and arrest every moron that does this. gross.
Lol, I’m a girl, and I wear leggings.
I’m not pregnant.
Her leggings are ugly though.
LOL me too. WTH are you talking about, Dubbz?
I am a legging wearing female, who happens to live in America. I guess that makes me a slut. I wasn’t aware that having sex with two guys made a female a slut … however, that is obviously true since you told me so. I also must be pregnant. I’ll let my boyfriend know right away. How should I tell him? “Sweetie, since we live in America and I wear leggings, I am a slut and pregnant with your child.” This should go over well.
She is wearing leggings…
flesh toned leggings
I’m voting for flesh-colored leggings.
The bottom of the shirts photo shopped
No it’s not.
yes it is…
PSD – photoshop disaster
Those are leggings. You can see a roll in the leggings at the bottom near the left shoe.
No one, I repeat, NO ONE should ever wear flesh-colored leggings! Ever!!
looks shopped
No it doesn’t. Try seeing some reality at some point.
The picture doesn’t have a natural look, in fact, I think the entire legs + part of her bottom are photoshop
Look again, but realize that her legs and butt are in fact covered with a close fitting, but not perfectly skin-tight fabric in a shade of peach that approximates her skin tone. Not shopped. If her legs were indeed bare, I could see where it would look that way, but those are really bad leggings.
Yeah, those are definitely flesh coloured leggings; still a no-no.
kinda looks photoshopped to me…the bottom of her skirt looks funny as well ass her ass
The bottom of her “skirt” looks funny because that’s actually her shirt, and her ass looks funny because she’s wearing leggings.
For once I agree. Looks ‘shopped.
God damn, some people should have never heard the term photo shopped.
So let me get this straight … you also think this looks shopped Taekwondogirl?
And goddamn, I wish you’d learn how to use alternate viewing perspectives. Detecting photoshop isn’t that hard in a lot of cases. In fact sometimes it means NOT focusing on the intended subject directly. try looking at it by looking off just to the side and using peripheral vision. It soon becomes clear that there are obvious shading flaws. Not lighting, but FLAWS in the use of photoshop technique.
Perfect example: Does the lower right part of the shirt she’s wearing actually *look* right to you? if you look again, it looks like a nice square of fabric is missing. It’s not on the other side. Big PS tip off.
It actually looks like the bottom right is kind of tucked under, like it isn’t laying perfectly flat on her body. And the shading only looks wrong if you’re thinking of the legs as being human skin.. But if you’re thinking of them being peach leggings (especially because a lot of light colored leggings are kind of shiny) then it looks right.
That looks shopped.
Def PS’d
I thought the same thing. How does some one forget pants? Then i looked harder and realized that this poor girl is wearing flesh colored leggings. Might as well be pant less though.
It’s not real.
flesh coloured leggings…but seriously though….leggings are cute under skirts and dressing…but not as pants seriously people
Only women would say that leggings sould not be worn as pants. But as a man I want to see more women dressed like this. She looks hot. More spandex for every woman( but they have to have the body to wear it)
I love wearing leggings; when they’re so flesh-toned that I look like I’m naked and have no actual asscrack is when there’s an issue.
Plus, this girl has chicken thighs.
You really think she has the body to wear spandex? Oh my. :S
They look horrible with that shirt and vest anyway.
Photoshop?
Doesn’t it look like it has been photoshopped? Her legs look drawn.
what a blow to her moral, she’s practically naked but everyone around seems to not notice…
were I’m from we call these No Pants-pants
No, no , no. you don’t understand. This is a brand new technology. A camera that shows people’s dreams. That is either some girl’s nightmare, or a guy’s wet dream.
LOL Actually I uploaded this pic and my caption was totally different than the one you see now.. My friends and I were at Starbucks on Melrose Ave and when she first walked by we had to do a double take coz we were like, “WTF is SHE NAKED” then we figured out it was leggings coz they were shiny when she passed by in the sun, also her skin tone is lighter than the leggings but I swear it’s not photoshopped. o.O There would be no point in uploading it here if it was. xD
Thank you for the clarification!
Oooh they’re the evil American Apparel shimmery early 80s aerobics legging! I get it now.
Hey, has anyone pointed out that she’s wearing flesh-colored leggings yet?
Yes.
Multiple times, and several hours before you posted this.
I’m thinking maybe For real? was being ironic.
Sarcasm detection fail.
Leggings ARE NOT pants.. Her friends should tell her how stupid she looks.
If she’s stupid enough to leave her house looking like this and thinking it looks good then she probably doesnt have the brightest friends.
Leggins /= pants
At least its not what I saw the other day (and sadly didnt get a picture of) a girl wearing tights as pants…you could see the crotch liner!
I bet that guy on the pic is preparing his cell phone camera to also take one picture.. hehe
LOL actually I think so too coz as you can see him getting ready to get in back of her for no reason other than to take a pic of her ass, I took this pic. lol
Nice view, but what of the other side, then we would know for sure!!!!!
I’m thinking shopped too. Someone changed the color of her leggings to make it look like she’s not wearing pants (which she *technically* isn’t).
You guys can say “those are leggings” all you want, but that doesn’t take away from the fact that she’s STILL not wearing any pants. the title and caption remain relevant.
Yes, taekwondogirl, this has been Photoshopped. Just because you have a hot avatar, doesn’t mean you know everything about the shop.
You can be forgiven, it is hard to spot the telltale signs at this resolution. Notice the cloning echo on the LHS ankle, the change in skin colour about a third the way down her thigh, and the unnatural look of butt. The highlight on the LHS of her hips looks odd too – where is that light coming from? I would suggest that originally she was wearing leggings or very little and someone decided to take it to the next level. I’m sure if she really was sans skirt, more eyes would be directed her way.
For the record, I am a full time retoucher, and have done many a dodgy retouch, so know what to look for.
Ahaha Syd Kyd and your condescending commentary, did you not read what mamahoon wrote?
Hi Whatever.
Hmmm…. I didn’t intend to be condescending, more playful than anything – perhaps because I liked her avatar, and also feared retribution from someone who includes a martial art in their screen name.
Yes, I did read mamahoon wrote, but it wouldn’t be the first time I’ve read someone taking credit for a photo and providing a story that wasn’t legit. Who knows, perhaps it is true? I’d be happy to wager a moderate amount of money that the image has been retouched in some way.
lol Thanks.
I uploaded it without making a username so that’s my fault. xD Well I’m glad it has more thumbs up than down ahaha :O
Hi mamahoon.
I still reckon it looks kind of dodgy, but I am big enough to concede when I am wrong.
It must of been a particularly lovely fabric to photograph that way. 
Perhaps if you had used a username I would of been less skeptical. You can be forgiven for forgetting to take credit, no doubt you were still in a state of shock when uploading.
Congrats on the excellent shot.
If you use enough smileys, it’s ok to be condescending, not to mention wrong.
Hmmm…. I still don’t read the condescending, just concise, but will concede perhaps I am wrong. I’d still be willing to wager a round of drinks on it, if only for an excuse to reward the photographer and have a bit of a laugh about flesh coloured leggings.
Congrats to mamahoon for capturing this. Wish I had been there to snigger too.
Oh really? The person who actually took the photo explained why it is NOT a photoshop. Guess you missed that, right? Are you feeling a little silly now?
The light on her left hip is coming from all the reflected light off those shiny surfaces you see at the LHS of the cafe. Ditto the ”change in skin colour”. I find it very easy to believe you’ve done many a dodgy retouch, if you know this little about reflected light. And her bum looks weird because leggings are evil, and must be stopped.
Stunts like this ruin casual Friday for everyone.
i’d hit it
Anything is possible on the streets of Hollywood. 24 hour freak show.
U can tell by her ass crack…either shop’d or leggings
She will wake up any moment now and realise it was just one of those bad dreams.
I thought this was just another picture of Gianna Michaels
It has to be leggings, she doesn’t have a buttcrack
Either she’s got tights on or she has NO ASS CRACK!
I’d do her….
Interesting, blurry legs..’shopped. But funny
i don’t care if you got the body of Megan fox and the ass of Marissa miller nobody i mean nobody should wear tights as pants. please ladys if you got a nice ass and you want to show it off at least wear some daisy dukes or something there’s no shoes or top that go with tights you just look silly like some 80′s ski trip s**t lmao
So obviously faked
this is skirting the issue.
That is sooo the wrong color. The fleshy peach stretchy pants so clashes with her top.
this was posted on the wrong blog…
http://photoshopfail.net/
[...] Somebody Definitely Needs Their Morning Cup… I’m having a really hard time trying to understand how this happened… how do you actually forget your pants? [...]
It’s funny to me how many people are sure this has to be photoshopped. I use to live in LA and this is just another normal idiot that thinks that if people sees her body that she will be admired. I feel sorry for girls that go out in these leggings or tights and think they are so special because people are looking at her. And they are looking, the guys are thinking “I’d do that” and the women are thinking “OMG get dressed”. But the guys are ONLY thinking about sex not about her, and the women are normally just shaking their heads.
This woman has a lovely body. I am more horrified that people on here think that she is too fat, than I am by her bad fashion choice. Obviously, the idea of *healthy* is screwed up here.
Photoshop. Without a doubt.
She’s wearing flesh-colored leggings.
Which, I have to say, is almost as bad as not wearing pants.
Let’s face it, they’re leggings. And doing exactly what she wants: to get her noticed.
Therefore, it’s a completely successful fashion decision. She certainly didn’t dress this way so that people wouldn’t notice her.
I think it’s less about her forgetting her pants and more about her remembering her ass.
Interesting choice of pants
Fake… Loser
Fap?
I think all the people who think this is shopped need to get out of the house more they are clearly shiny flesh toned leggings I have some I wear under skirts and dresses never as pants Its an unfortunate trend I blame on the Olson twins and American Apparel.
Here are the exact leggings in question
http://www.thefashionpolice.net/2009/08/american-apparels-nylon-tricot-high-waist-leggings.html
http://store.americanapparel.net/rnt349.html
Lordy, people, it’s the 21st century. Use your eyes: PHOTOSHOP, PHOTOSHOP, PHOTOSHOP!!! (I mean, the shadows alone…)
I’d tap dat azz!
Cover your bum with a long sweater or tunic when you wear leggings! No one wants to see that!
this pict. is not the fail here. The fail is you posted this on fail blog thinking that she failed by not waring leggings when she is. yes clearly wrong choice of color to wear with that skirt…. however the photo does look like it might have been photoshop to make it appear to look like she not waring anything, if that’s the case that a fail because its pretty noticeable that its not skin…….. overall poster’s fail
UMMM….. wouldnt sombody have stoped her on the way out of her house?? unless she lives alone…..That would explain alot……:l
Think she’s waring skin-colored leggins.
Apparently she does not own a full length mirror…
Fat, bold guy with pointy shoes is NOT looking. obvious photoshop!
The last thing she must do is turn around.!!!!!!!!
This isn’t flesh tone. The color of the leggings match the peach/apricot plaid in her wrinkled shirt.
Those aren’t leggings, it’s a photoshop and not even a decent on to begin with. Failblog, seriously, you should be embarrassed of falling for this – you guys should be much better than that at spotting fakes by now!
Gegus Chris..if people weren’t so lazy, they’d read that it’s been clarified by the uploader that this is not photoshopped, and she is, in fact, wearing ill-thought-out leggings.
On a side note, I think if you have the body to pull it off, wear whatever the ef you want! People excercise and get sexyy fo’ a reason, mayn. 8)
Shopped, and badly. Look closely at her thighs and you can see where the original hemline of her skirt was