Submitted by: Unknown
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Rawr I’m a Rabbit WITH EARS ON MY BACK | That’s Basically What It Feels Like Next »
» See all 36 comments
Leave a Reply
-
Chic Chatter
Kinseth on The Saddest Narwhal You’… ClariPossum on Who’s Outfit is it … ClariPossum on Baby, Baby, Baby, Oooooh ClariPossum on This Walmart is SO Not Ka… mad_mad_river on Cash Curls Everywhere Around… ClariPossum on It Won’t Sink, That… kitzkatz on Teach Me of These Magical Smoo… mad_mad_river on When All Other Pockets Fa… short1fry on It Won’t Sink, That… John on Baby, Baby, Baby, Oooooh
I just don’t understand this low baggy pants thing. Are girls suppose to find this sexy? Can somebody explain why? Why?? In the name of all that is right and holy and sensible, why? Why!!??
Or is this guy just have very short legs?
opps, replace the ‘is’ with ‘does’ in the last sentence
And “suppose”, with “supposed”.
Why? Easy access. Seriously.
easy access to their behind for another male like in prison? Because if you are talking about easy access for them to get the front parts to a chick, honestly how hard is it to pull your pants down only when you need to?
Like I would ever want any kind of access to a DB like this….
i heard it started off in prisons, to show availability.. low slung pants = available. I dont care how true that is, every time i see low pants thats what im gona think :p
I’ve heard that, and I’ve also heard it was due to lack of well-fitting pants and that they don’t allow belts.
It’s prison style. It means he’s a bottom.
I don’t get it either, after I lost some weight my pants started to be to loose “not nearly this bad but still” and it was extremely uncomfortable.. i couldn’t use the pockets or run without worrying about them falling down D:
it’s just stupid…
Two dwarves, one sitting on the other’s shoulders? No, it’s just a plonker.
Suspenders fastened to pockets and sides of legs? Definitely a plonker.
… or maybe he’s getting ready to cr*p in his bag.
One dwarf, holding a body of… scarecrow[?] wearing some douche’s clothes.
Back in the 19-teens or so, women wore really, really tight dresses called ‘hobble skirts’. They were designed so that the wearer couldn’t walk normally; she had to sort of shuffle.
Why in heaven’s name do young guys today want to wear hobble pants?!? (Although I have to admit, my friend the school resource officer — cop assigned to a high school — LOVES how much easier they make his job…..)
My late father, who grew up in New York City, told me that young guys used to hang around the trolley stations just so they could lift up the young ladies in hobble skirts and set them down from the car.
Hard for us to imagine…
i agree
they steal something and start running, the chop runs up and step on their pants, they go flying over. Blacks never learn
Oh, damn, you had to ruin your comment with that last sentence.
And trolls can’t spell.
Chop? You mean cop, or else you’re imagining some street thug being chased by a giant cut of pork, which means you have bigger problems than being a childish tool.
Not trolling if it is true.
About early 20th century hobble skirts:
An old man who lived in New York City once told me that young guys used to hang out at the trolley stops, because these skirts prevented women from stepping down from the train. The guys liked to lift the ladies down to the street level, in an epoch more prim than ours. Something we can’t really see from vintage B&W photo.
he doesnt have a belt and a waist too
its not very bad-ass is it? i mean, if the guy is badass and (eg) nicks a twix from the local deli.. he cant even run off to eat his stolen sh*t.
What gets me is that they wear a belt or shorts underneath…why? You sag anyway, lol. Just pull your pants up, no one wants to see your underwear.
I have no idea why guys want to advertise themselves this way. Sagging starting in prisons to let other guys know you are available so every time I see a guy sagging their pants I have to giggle and wonder if they know that.
Now, I’m going to be giggling too
No, girls do not find this sexy. Quite the opposite. In fact, nearly all ‘young men’s fashion’ seems specifically designed to make the young men as unattractive to the opposite sex as possible. Maybe these fashions are being promoted by the fathers of teenage girls…
I suspect these pants support themselves every bit as effectively as the wearer supports himself.
i am very much against boys/men wearing the saggy pants, but at least this one had the decency to wear a shirt long enough so as not to expose his underwear. don’t know if it was intended or just a pleasant accident
Positively ugly. I wish young men would understand that.
The straps make me think of bondage pants.
That… seems like a slightly odd meshing of subcultures.
That is without a doubt the stupidest fashion trend I have ever witnessed… and I lived thru the disco era!
suspenders dont support themselves….ha neither does those 8 illegitimate kids he has
The great thing is that the little jerk can’t really run from the cops…
I didn’t realize legwarmers were back in style.
What I can’t understand is how they just don’t fall down. Is there some kind of extreme sag underpants with hooks or somthing. At least in my head the debate is now over. This is much dumber looking than skinny jeans.
This poor boy is just completely misunderstood! He’s just scared and helpless and longs for the love and attention a mother would give him. The pants are a plain sign of that: He wants to be a baby again, a baby people would find adoreable and the need to care for it, a baby of course shits his pants and must be swaddled…
Really, these trousers always remind me of little children or babys with their trousers heavily loaded…no girl on earth can find that sexy…and sorry, unless you’re in some way handicapped the nursing-reflex won’t work either…no, sorry, people wearing this voluntarily must be handicapped…
why do i feel the urge to grab his bag and run? and then, just around the corner, wait until he stumbles by, cursing?
also: those guys are just friendly; they will help the fatties survive the zombiecalypse!